Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fout
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 12:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article is likely a hoax. There is no evidence that such a drink exists. Article is a new editor's only edits. The only editors who have edited the article are SocialAnthropologist27 (talk · contribs) and an anonymous user. Article's citations, several of which are 404 errors, do not establish that such a drink exists. Contrary to the claims of the article, chinanowmag.com does not reference 'fout' — goethean ॐ 19:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. 27 years to brew? Clarityfiend 20:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Stephenb (Talk) 20:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Tastes better than smack" as a fact?! Hoax. Kevinwong913 Speak out loud! 20:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a stunningly nonsensical hoax. I do not see any evidence that any beverage has the power to suck all matter into a black hole. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as patent nonsense (potentially BJAODN material, but not particularly funny).Terraxos 01:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.